Whipple's cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus pyloric-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists in the literature as to the best technique for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), whether pyloric preservation (PP-CPD) or Whipple's technique (with antrectomy [W-CPD]), the former being associated with a higher frequency of delayed gastric emptying (DGE). METHODS: Retrospective and comparative study between PP-CPD technique (n = 124 patients) and W-CPD technique (n = 126 patients), in patients who were operated for tumors of the pancreatic head and periampullary region between the period 2012 and 2023. RESULTS: Surgical time was longer, although not significant, with the W-CPD technique. Pancreatic and peripancreatic tumor invasion (p = 0.031) and number of lymph nodes resected (p < 0.0001) reached statistical significance in W-CPD, although there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of lymph node tumor invasion. Regarding postoperative morbimortality (medical complications, postoperative pancreatic fistula [POPF], hemorrhage, RVG, re-interventions, in-hospital mortality, Clavien-Dindo complications), ICU and hospital stay, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. During follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the groups for morbidity and mortality at 90 days and survival at 1, 3 and 5 years. Binary logistic regression analysis for DGE showed that binary relevant POPF grade B/C was a significant risk factor for DGE. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative morbidity and mortality and long-term survival were not significantly different with PP-CPD and W-CPD, but POPF grade B/C was a risk factor for DGE grade C.

Post-transplant biliary complications using liver grafts from deceased donors older than 70 years: Retrospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of liver grafts and subsequent waitlist mortality led us to expand the donor pool using liver grafts from older donors. AIM: To determine the incidence, outcomes, and risk factors for biliary complications (BC) in liver transplantation (LT) using liver grafts from donors aged > 70 years. METHODS: Between January 1994 and December 31, 2019, 297 LTs were performed using donors older than 70 years. After excluding 47 LT for several reasons, we divided 250 LTs into two groups, namely post-LT BC (n = 21) and without BC (n = 229). This retrospective case-control study compared both groups. RESULTS: Choledocho-choledochostomy without T-tube was the most frequent technique (76.2% in the BC group vs 92.6% in the non-BC group). Twenty-one patients (8.4%) developed BC (13 anastomotic strictures, 7 biliary leakages, and 1 non-anastomotic biliary stricture). Nine patients underwent percutaneous balloon dilation and nine required a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy because of dilation failure. The incidence of post-LT complications (graft dysfunction, rejection, renal failure, and non-BC reoperations) was similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in the patient and graft survival between the groups. Moreover, only three deaths were attributed to BC. While female donors were protective factors for BC, donor cardiac arrest was a risk factor. CONCLUSION: The incidence of BC was relatively low on using liver grafts > 70 years. It could be managed in most cases by percutaneous dilation or Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, without significant differences in the patient or graft survival between the groups.

Duodenopancreatectomía cefálica en pacientes octogenarios con tumores de páncreas / Cephalic duodenopancreatectomy in octogenarium patients with pancreatic tumors

Introducción: Según estudios previos, la duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (DPC) por cáncer de páncreas (CP) se asocia a un incremento de la supervivencia mediana tanto en pacientes octogenarios como en pacientes de menor edad. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo y comparativo de la DPC realizada en 30 pacientes≥80 años con CP y en 159 pacientes<80 años. Resultados: Los pacientes octogenarios presentaban una tasa significativamente mayor de morbilidad cardiovascular preoperatoria y un comportamiento tumoral más agresivo (mayor anemia, ictericia y CA 19-9 preoperatorios, invasión vascular y neural y menor frecuencia de resección R0 a pesar de utilizar la misma técnica quirúrgica). No hubo diferencias significativas en cuanto a complicaciones postoperatorias. La mortalidad postoperatoria fue similar en ambos grupos (3,3% en octogenarios versus 3,1% en <80 años). Las causas de mortalidad durante el seguimiento fueron fundamentalmente por recidiva tumoral, complicaciones cardiovasculares y COVID-19 (2 octogenarios). La supervivencia actuarial a 1, 3 y 5 años fue significativamente mayor en pacientes <80 años que en octogenarios (el 85,9%, el 61,1% y el 39,2% versus el 72,7%, el 28,9% y el 9,6%, respectivamente; p=0,001). En el estudio multivariable, la presencia de una fístula pancreática y la no utilización de tutor externo del Wirsung influyeron de forma estadísticamente significativa sobre la mortalidad a 90 días post-DPC. Conclusiones: La morbimortalidad post-DPC es similar en octogenarios y <80 años, aunque la supervivencia a largo plazo es menor por la agresividad tumoral y comorbilidad asociada a la edad avanzada. (AU)

Introduction: Current literature supports the claim that performing a cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPD) as treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC) is associated with an increase in median survival, both in octogenarian (≥80 years) patients as well as younger patients. Methods: This is a retrospective and comparative trial, comparing results for CPD performed on 30 patients ≥80 years with PC and 159 patients <80 years. Results: The patients in the octogenarian group showed a significantly higher rate of preoperative cardiovascular morbidity and a more aggressive tumoral behaviour, including more significant preoperative anemia, jaundice and levels of CA 19-9, higher vascular and neural invasion, and a lower rate of R0 resection despite using the same surgical technique. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative complications. Postoperative mortality was similar in both groups (3.3% in octogenarians vs. 3.1% in patients <80 years). Mortality during follow-up was mainly due to tumour recurrence, cardiovascular complications and COVID-19 in 2elderly patients. Actuarial survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was significantly larger for patients <80 years old, as compared to octogenarians (85.9%, 61.1% and 39.2% versus 72.7%, 28.9% and 9.6%, respectively; P=0.001). The presence of a pancreatic fistula and not using external Wirsung stenting were significantly associated with 90-day postoperative mortality after a CPD. Conclusions: Morbidity and mortality post-CPD is similar in octogenarians and patients younger than 80, although long-term survival is shorter due to more aggressive tumours and comorbidities associated with older age. (AU)

Cephalic pancreatoduodenectomy in octogenarian patients with pancreatic tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Current literature supports the claim that performing a cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPD) as treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC) is associated with an increase in median survival, both in octogenarian (≥80 years) patients as well as younger patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective and comparative trial, comparing results for CPD performed on 30 patients ≥80 years with PC and 159 patients <80 years. RESULTS: The patients in the octogenarian group showed a significantly higher rate of preoperative cardiovascular morbidity and a more aggressive tumoral behaviour, including more significant preoperative anemia, jaundice and levels of CA 19-9, higher vascular and neural invasion, and a lower rate of R0 resection despite using the same surgical technique. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative complications. Postoperative mortality was similar in both groups (3.3% in octogenarians vs 3.1% in patients <80 years). Mortality during follow-up was mainly due to tumour recurrence, cardiovascular complications and COVID-19 in 2 elderly patients. Actuarial survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was significantly larger for patients <80 years old, as compared to octogenarians (85.9%, 61.1% and 39.2% versus 72.7%, 28.9% and 9.6%, respectively; P = 0.001). The presence of a pancreatic fistula and not using external Wirsung stenting were significantly associated with 90-day postoperative mortality after a CPD. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality post-CPD is similar in octogenarians and patients younger than 80, although long-term survival is shorter due to more aggressive tumours and comorbidities associated with older age.

Expanding donor age in liver transplantation using liver grafts from nonagenarian donors.

INTRODUCTION: Satisfactory outcomes in a series of liver transplantations (LT) with octogenarian liver grafts have been reported, as well as several cases of LT using nonagenarian liver grafts with short follow-up. METHODS: From October 2013 to December 2019, we performed 426 LT. Six LTs used nonagenarian livers (case group) and 49 used octogenarian livers (control group). A comparative analysis was performed between groups. Median donor age was significantly higher in the nonagenarian group than in the octogenarian group (90.6 years versus 83.4 years; (P < .001). There was a significant difference in LT indications (P = .026) between the groups, but not in perioperative recipient variables, morbidity, or mortality. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 67.7% in the recipients of nonagenarian livers and 85.7%, 78.0%, and 74.4%, respectively, in the recipients of octogenarian livers (P = .631). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were 66.7% in the recipients of nonagenarian livers and 81.3%, 73.8%, and 70.3%, respectively, in the recipients of octogenarian livers (P = .745). CONCLUSIONS: The results of LT with nonagenarian liver grafts are not significantly different from those obtained with octogenarian donors, taking into consideration the small sample size and careful selection of donors and adequate donor-recipient matching.

Decreased Long-Term Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2-Specific Humoral Immunity in Liver Transplantation Recipients 12 Months After Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Long-term humoral immunity and its protective role in liver transplantation (LT) patients have not been elucidated. We performed a prospective multicenter study to assess the persistence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in LT recipients 12 months after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A total of 65 LT recipients were matched with 65 nontransplanted patients by a propensity score including variables with recognized impact on COVID-19. LT recipients showed a lower prevalence of anti-nucleocapsid (27.7% versus 49.2%; P = 0.02) and anti-spike IgG antibodies (88.2% versus 100.0%; P = 0.02) at 12 months. Lower index values of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies were also observed in transplantation patients 1 year after COVID-19 (median, 0.49 [interquartile range, 0.15-1.40] versus 1.36 [interquartile range, 0.53-2.91]; P < 0.001). Vaccinated LT recipients showed higher antibody levels compared with unvaccinated patients (P < 0.001); antibody levels reached after vaccination were comparable to those observed in nontransplanted individuals (P = 0.70). In LT patients, a longer interval since transplantation (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.20) was independently associated with persistence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies 1 year after infection. In conclusion, compared with nontransplanted patients, LT recipients show a lower long-term persistence of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies. However, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination after COVID-19 in LT patients achieves a significant increase in antibody levels, comparable to that of nontransplanted patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 in liver transplant patients: Clinical and therapeutic aspects.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has profoundly impacted liver transplant (LT) activity across the world, with notable decreases in the number of donations and procedures in most Western countries, in particular throughout the first wave. The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 in LT recipients (with estimates ranging from 0.34% to 1.56%) appears to be at least comparable to that observed for the general population. Clinical and radiological features at presentation are also similar to non-transplant patients. The risk of death among LT recipients requiring hospital admission is high (from 12% to 19%), although some authors have suggested that overall mortality may be actually lower compared to the general non-transplant population. It is likely that these poor outcomes may be mainly influenced by the older age and higher comorbidity burden of LT recipients, rather than by the transplant status itself. In fact, it has been hypothesized that post-transplant immunosuppression would exert a protective role, with special focus on tacrolimus-containing regimens. There is scarce evidence to guide the optimal management of post-transplant COVID-19 and the use of antiviral or immunomodulatory therapies, although both clinical practice and guidelines support the dose reduction or withdrawal of anti-proliferative agents such as mofetil mycophenolate. Preliminary reports suggest that the antibody response to messenger RNA vaccines is significantly impaired as compared to non-immunocompromised individuals, in line with other transplant populations. Finally, it is foreseeable that the future will be conditioned by the emerging variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 with increased transmissibility among LT recipients.

Duodenopancreatectomía cefálica y tutorización externa del conducto de Wirsung. Resultados de una serie de 80 casos consecutivos / Pancreaticoduodenectomy and external Wirsung stenting: our outcomes in 80 cases

Introducción: Existe controversia respecto a la técnica ideal de reconstrucción pancreático-yeyunal posresección duodeno-pancreática. La tutorización externa del Wirsung se ha considerado por muchos autores como una técnica con menor incidencia de fístulas y morbimortalidad. Analizamos nuestra experiencia con esta técnica. Pacientes y métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de la morbimortalidad, de una serie de 80 pacientes consecutivos intervenidos, durante 6,5 años, por tumores pancreáticos cefálicos o periampulares realizando resección y pancreático-yeyunostomía con tutorización externa del Wirsung. Resultados: La edad media de los pacientes fue 68,3 ± 9 años y la tasa de resecabilidad del 78%. La consistencia del páncreas era blanda en 51,2% de pacientes y dura en 48,8%. Se preservó el píloro en 43,8%. El tumor más frecuente fue el adenocarcinoma (68,8%) y se consiguió un R0 en 70%. La fístula bioquímica se presentó en 11,2%, la fístula pancreática grado B en 12,5% y la C en 2,5%, mientras que la tasa de reintervención abdominal fue del 10%. La mediana de estancia hospitalaria fue de 16 días y la mortalidad postoperatoria y a 90 días fue del 2,5%. La tasa de retraso del vaciamiento gástrico fue del 36,3%, diabetes de novo del 12,5% e insuficiencia exocrina del 30%. La supervivencia a uno, tres y cinco años fue 80,2, 53,6 y 19,2%. Conclusiones: Aunque nuestras tasas de morbimortalidad con la tutorización externa del Wirsung son bajas, coincidiendo con series más amplias recientemente publicadas, se precisa un análisis comparativo con otras técnicas reconstructivas, con más casos, para elegir la mejor opción después de una duodenopancreatectomía cefálica. (AU)

Introduction: There is controversy regarding the ideal pancreaticojejunostomy technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Many authors consider the external Wirsung stenting technique to be associated with a low incidence of fistula, morbidity and mortality. We analyse our experience with this technique. Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of the morbidity and mortality of a series of 80 consecutive patients who had been treated surgically over a 6.5-year period for pancreatic head or periampullary tumors, performing pancreaticoduodenectomy and pancreaticojejunostomy with external Wirsung duct stenting. Results: Mean patient age was 68.3 ± 9 years, and the resectability rate was 78%. The texture of the pancreas was soft in 51.2% of patients and hard in 48.8%. Pylorus-preserving resection was performed in 43.8%. Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent tumor (68.8%), and R0 was confirmed in 70% of patients. Biochemical fistula was observed in 11.2%, pancreatic fistula grade B in 12.5% and C in 2.5%, whereas the abdominal reoperation rate was 10%. Median postoperative hospital stay was 16 days, and postoperative and 90-day mortality was 2.5%. Delayed gastric emptying was observed in 36.3% of patients, de novo diabetes in 12.5%, and exocrine insufficiency in 3. Patient survival rates after 1, 3 and 5 years were 80.2, 53.6 and 19.2%, respectively. Conclusions: Although our low rates of postoperative complications and mortality using external Wirsung duct stenting coincides with other more numerous recent series, it is necessary to perform a comparative analysis with other techniques, including more cases, to choose the best reconstruction technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy. (AU)

Pancreaticoduodenectomy and external Wirsung stenting: Our outcomes in 80 cases.

INTRODUCTION: There is controversy regarding the ideal pancreaticojejunostomy technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Many authors consider the external Wirsung stenting technique to be associated with a low incidence of fistula, morbidity and mortality. We analyse our experience with this technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the morbidity and mortality of a series of 80 consecutive patients who had been treated surgically over a 6.5-year period for pancreatic head or periampullary tumors, performing pancreaticoduodenectomy and pancreaticojejunostomy with external Wirsung duct stenting. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 68.3 ± 9 years, and the resectability rate was 78%. The texture of the pancreas was soft in 51.2% of patients and hard in 48.8%. Pylorus-preserving resection was performed in 43.8%. Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent tumor (68.8%), and R0 was confirmed in 70% of patients. Biochemical fistula was observed in 11.2%, pancreatic fistula grade B in 12.5% and C in 2.5%, whereas the abdominal reoperation rate was 10%. Median postoperative hospital stay was 16 days, and postoperative and 90-day mortality was 2.5%. Delayed gastric emptying was observed in 36.3% of patients, de novo diabetes in 12.5%, and exocrine insufficiency in 3. Patient survival rates after 1, 3 and 5 years were 80.2%, 53.6% and 19.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although our low rates of postoperative complications and mortality using external Wirsung duct stenting coincides with other more numerous recent series, it is necessary to perform a comparative analysis with other techniques, including more cases, to choose the best reconstruction technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Changes in humoral immune response after SARS-CoV-2 infection in liver transplant recipients compared to immunocompetent patients.

The protective capacity and duration of humoral immunity after SARS-CoV-2 infection are not yet understood in solid organ transplant recipients. A prospective multicenter study was performed to evaluate the persistence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies in liver transplant recipients 6 months after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) resolution. A total of 71 liver transplant recipients were matched with 71 immunocompetent controls by a propensity score including variables with a well-known prognostic impact in COVID-19. Paired case-control serological data were also available in 62 liver transplant patients and 62 controls at month 3 after COVID-19. Liver transplant recipients showed a lower incidence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies at 3 months (77.4% vs. 100%, p < .001) and at 6 months (63.4% vs. 90.1%, p < .001). Lower levels of antibodies were also observed in liver transplant patients at 3 (p = .001) and 6 months (p < .001) after COVID-19. In transplant patients, female gender (OR = 13.49, 95% CI: 2.17-83.8), a longer interval since transplantation (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.36), and therapy with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (OR = 7.11, 95% CI: 1.47-34.50) were independently associated with persistence of antibodies beyond 6 months after COVID-19. Therefore, as compared with immunocompetent patients, liver transplant recipients show a lower prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and more pronounced antibody levels decline.

Neoplasias quísticas hepáticas: experiencia en un único centro y revisión de la literatura / Cystic liver neoplams: A single centre experience and literature review

INTRODUCCIÓN: La neoplasia quística hepática es una neoplasia poco frecuente, que representa aproximadamente el 5% de las lesiones quísticas del hígado. El diagnóstico preoperatorio es difícil y puede causar confusión. El objetivo del estudio es analizar una serie de casos operados en nuestro centro con diagnóstico anatomopatológico de neoplasia quística hepática y describir la sintomatología, diagnóstico y tratamiento de acuerdo con la actual clasificación. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de todas las neoplasias quísticas hepáticas operadas entre enero de 2000 y diciembre de 2019. El estudio se basó en los informes de anatomía patológica ya existentes. Los casos anteriores al 2010 fueron reclasificados según la clasificación de la OMS del año 2010. RESULTADOS: La muestra total del estudio resultó en 10 pacientes: 6 fueron neoplasias mucinosas quísticas hepáticas y 4 neoplasias papilares intraductales biliares. La mayoría de los pacientes fueron mujeres (8/10) y la edad media fue de 47 años. En cuanto al tratamiento, hubo 3 hepatectomías y 7 enucleaciones. En ningún caso se realizó una biopsia intraoperatoria de los márgenes quirúrgicos. En un caso se observó atipia celular variable con zonas de adenocarcinoma, por lo que el paciente recibió quimioterapia adyuvante con taxol y carboplatino. En todos los casos los márgenes de resección fueron negativos. CONCLUSIÓN: Las neoplasias quísticas hepáticas son tumores poco frecuentes, que plantean un dilema en el diagnóstico diferencial, por lo que, ante la sospecha radiológica, el tratamiento de elección debería ser la resección completa del tumor para evitar su malignización y la recidiva

INTRODUCTION: The hepatic cystic tumour is a very rare neoplasm, representing about 5% of all cystic liver neoplasms. The preoperative diagnosis is difficult and can lead to confusion. The aim of this study is to analyze a number of cases operated at our centre with an histologic diagnosis of liver cystic neoplasms and also to describe the sintomathology, diagnosis and management as per the recent classification. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed including all the cystic liver neoplasms operated between January 2000 and December 2019. The study was performed based on the pre-existing pathology archives. The 2010 previous cases were reclassified following the new 2010 OMS classification. RESULTS: The study sample was of 10 patients, identifying 6 of them as mucinous cystic liver neoplasms, and the other 4 as intraductal papillary biliary neoplasms. The majority of the patients were women (8/10) and the median age was 47 years. Regarding the treatment, 3 hepatectomy and 7 enucleations were performed. Frozen section intraoperatively was not required in any case. In one case, variable cellular atypia with areas of adenocarcinoma was observed, and the patient received neoadyuvant chemotherapy with taxol and carboplatin. In all cases the resection margins were negative. CONCLUSION: Cystic liver neoplasms are infrequent tumours with a difficult differential diagnosis. Therefore, with a high radiological suspicious, the treatment should be a complete resection to avoid recurrences and malignancies

Cystic liver neoplams: A single centre experience and literature review. / Neoplasias quísticas hepáticas: experiencia en un único centro y revisión de la literatura.

INTRODUCTION: The hepatic cystic tumour is a very rare neoplasm, representing about 5% of all cystic liver neoplasms. The preoperative diagnosis is difficult and can lead to confusion. The aim of this study is to analyze a number of cases operated at our centre with an histologic diagnosis of liver cystic neoplasms and also to describe the sintomathology, diagnosis and management as per the recent classification. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed including all the cystic liver neoplasms operated between January 2000 and December 2019. The study was performed based on the pre-existing pathology archives. The 2010 previous cases were reclassified following the new 2010 OMS classification. RESULTS: The study sample was of 10 patients, identifying 6 of them as mucinous cystic liver neoplasms, and the other 4 as intraductal papillary biliary neoplasms. The majority of the patients were women (8/10) and the median age was 47 years. Regarding the treatment, 3 hepatectomy and 7 enucleations were performed. Frozen section intraoperatively was not required in any case. In one case, variable cellular atypia with areas of adenocarcinoma was observed, and the patient received neoadyuvant chemotherapy with taxol and carboplatin. In all cases the resection margins were negative. CONCLUSION: Cystic liver neoplasms are infrequent tumours with a difficult differential diagnosis. Therefore, with a high radiological suspicious, the treatment should be a complete resection to avoid recurrences and malignancies.

Intestinal obstruction secondary to Crohn-like disease in common variable immu-nodeficiency.

A 32-year-old male patient with common variable immunodeficiency (CVI), under treatment with human immunoglobulin G, experienced recurrent episodes of intestinal pseudo-obstruction that were medically treated. Imaging tests showed a non-obstructive ileal stenosis and biopsies performed during ileocolonoscopy revealed nod-ular lymphoid hyperplasia.

Liver transplant in a receptor with ABO incompatibility: a viable option.

We present the case of a 41-year-old male with type A blood group and a diagnosis of fulminant liver failure of an unknown cause, who was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with severe coagulopathy (INR 6), hyperammonemia (250 umol/l) and grade IV encephalopathy (four King's criteria and both Clichy's criteria). He also had GCS 8/15, despite TDE-MARS, dialysis and ventilator support via endotracheal tube due to encephalopathy. He was registered as status 0 for liver transplant. In the absence of a compatible donor, the patient received an ABO incompatible liver transplant (LT), group O, using the piggyback technique, without any complications. He required transfusion of five units of plasma but did not require a blood transfusion.